The Effect of using Recycled Materials in Earth-Based Blocks
K.J. Dick, J. Pienuta, K. Arnold
Abstract. Polystyrene and plastic use is ubiquitous worldwide and has a detrimental impact on the environment due to their inability to decompose. Incorporating waste into earth-based building materials provides an innovative approach to utilize expanded polystyrene (EPS) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) waste, along with other recyclable materials including paper, plastic and cardboard. The research presented in this paper discusses the material properties of earth combined with various recyclables, including paper, cardboard, with varying percentages of EPS and plastic. The effect on density, moisture content, load-deformation behaviour, and compressive strength of earth test cylinders was evaluated for non-heat treated and heat-treated specimens. A series of tests were conducted on cylinders with various mix designs. The results indicate that an increase in the EPS content results in a decrease in the density, stiffness, and compressive strength, whereas the axial deformation, and Poisson’s ratio increased. Subjecting the cylinders to heat prior to testing resulted in an increased compressive strength, but decreased the average density, moisture content, axial deformation and Poisson’s ratio for the mixtures. Unheated specimens with plastic exhibited higher compression values when compared to heated cylinders. Compressive strengths ranged from 1.12 to 2.25 MPa for EPS specimens while the PET specimens had a range of 1.23 to 2.23 MPa.
Expanded Polystyrene (EPS), Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET), Recycled Material, Earth Building, Compressive Strength
Published online , 10 pages
Copyright © 2018 by the author(s)
Published under license by Materials Research Forum LLC., Millersville PA, USA
Citation: K.J. Dick, J. Pienuta, K. Arnold, ‘The Effect of using Recycled Materials in Earth-Based Blocks’, Materials Research Proceedings, Vol. 7, pp 775-784, 2018
The article was published as article 76 of the book Non-Conventional Materials and Technologies
 ASTM International. 2016. Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens – C39/C39M-16b. West Conshohocken, PA.
 Babu, D.S., K.G. Babu and W. Tiong-Huan. 2006. Effect of polystyrene aggregate size on strength and migration characteristics of lightweight concrete. Cement & Concrete Composites 28:520–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.02.018
 Balaban, O. and J.A.Puppim de Oliveira. 2016. Sustainable cities for healthier cities: assessing the co-benefits of green buildings in Japan. Journal of Cleaner Production.
 Collet, F. and C. Lanos. 2011. Mechanical properties of hempcrete. Équipe Matériaux Thermo-Rhéologie. Rennes, France.
 Demirbaᶊ, A. 1999. Physical properties of briquettes from waste paper and wheat straw mixtures. Energy Conversion & Management. 40: 437-445. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-8904(98)00111-3
 EPSA Ltd. 2014. About EPS. http://epsa.org.au/about-eps/. 2016.
 Griffith, K. 2007. Physical properties of an Anola soil based cob re-inforced with chicken feathers. Unpublished senior thesis Biosystems Engineering, University of Manitoba, Advisor K. Dick, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. University Department, University, City, Province.
 Kan, A., R. Demirboğa. 2009. A new technique of processing for waste-expanded polystyrene foams as aggregates. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 209:2994-3000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.07.017
 Kariyawasam, K.K.G.K.D., and C. Jayasinghe. 2016. Cement stabilized rammed earth as a suitable construction material. Construction and Building Materials 105:519–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.189
 Kazemi, A. 1987. Strength development in concrete blocks containing flyash. Unpublished M.Sc. thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB.
 Krundaeva, A., G. De Bruyne, F. Gagliardi and W. Van Parpegem. 2016. Dynamic compressive strength and crushing properties of expanded polystyrene foam for different strain rates and different temperatures. Polymer Testing 55: 61-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.08.005
 National Ready Mix Concrete Association. 2003. Testing compressive strength of concrete. Concrete in Practice. CIP-35.
 Qin, L., W. Chen, and X. Li. 2014. Experimental research on compressive strength of adobe with cement. Applied Mechanics and Materials 507:217-221. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.507.217
 Ramamurthy, K., E.K. Kunhanandan Nambiar and G. Indu Siva Ranjani. 2009. A classification of studies on properties of foam concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites 31: 388-396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.04.006
 Roylance, D. 2008. Mechanical Properties of Materials. Cambridge, Massachussetts: MIT.
 Saikia, N. and J. de Brito. 2012. Use of plastic waste as aggregate in cement mortar and concrete preparation: A review. Construction and Building Materials 34: 385-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.02.066
 Sayadi, A.A., J.V. Tapia, T.R. Neitzert and G.C. Clifton. 2016. Effects of expanded polystyrene (EPS) particles on fire resistance, thermal conductivity and compressive strength of foamed concrete. Construction and Building Materials 112:716-724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.218
 Singh, K.D. and Tripura, D.D. 2014. Behaviour of cement-stabilized rammed earth circular column under axial loading. Materials and Structures. 49: 371-382.