Comparison of Different Methods of Residual Stress Determination of Cold-Rolled Austenitic-Ferritic, Austenitic and Ferritic Steels
J. Čapek, K. Trojan, J. Němeček, N. Ganev, K. Kolařík
download PDFAbstract. The aim of this contribution was to compare four methods of residual stresses determination of single-phase and dual-phase steels after cold-rolling primarily using X-ray diffraction techniques. Firstly, without taking into account the preferred orientation (sin2ψ method), secondly from the geometry of four-point bending, thirdly without neglecting the texture (harmonic function method). And mainly, the new method, by calculating anisotropic elastic constants as a weighted average between single-crystal and X-ray elastic constants with weighting being done according to the relative intensities in the measured directions. The applicability of the new method of residual stresses determination in textured materials was proofed; however, the method needs further verification.
Keywords
X-Ray Diffraction, Residual Stresses, Cold-Rolling, Texture
Published online 9/11/2018, 6 pages
Copyright © 2018 by the author(s)
Published under license by Materials Research Forum LLC., Millersville PA, USA
Citation: J. Čapek, K. Trojan, J. Němeček, N. Ganev, K. Kolařík, ‘Comparison of Different Methods of Residual Stress Determination of Cold-Rolled Austenitic-Ferritic, Austenitic and Ferritic Steels’, Materials Research Proceedings, Vol. 6, pp 145-150, 2018
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21741/9781945291890-23
The article was published as article 23 of the book Residual Stresses 2018
Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
References
[1] H.J. Bunge, Texture Analysis in Materials Science, Butterworth, London, 1982.
[2] U. Welzel, et al. Stress analysis of polycrystalline thin films and surface regions by X-ray diffraction, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 38 (2005) 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889804029516
[3] C.M. Brakman, A general treatment of X-ray (residual) macro-stress determination in textured cubic materials: General expressions, cubic invariancy and application to X-ray strain pole figures, Cryst. Res. Technol. 20.5 (1985) 593-618. https://doi.org/10.1002/crat.2170200503
[4] H. Dölle, The Influence of Multiaxial Stress States, Stress Gradients and Elastic Anisotropy on the Evaluation of (Residual) Stresses by X-rays, J. Appl. Cryst. 12 (1979) 489-501. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889879013169
[5] J. Capek, Z. Pala, O. Kovarik, Residual stresses determination in textured substrates for plasma sprayed coatings, IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 82.1 (2015) 012112.
[6] F. Bachmann, R. Hielscher, H. Schaeben, Texture Analysis with MTEX | Free and Open Source Software Toolbox, Solid State Phenomen. 60 (2010) 63-68. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.160.63
[7] J.D. Eshelby, The determination of the elastic field of an ellipsoidal inclusion, and related problems, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A. 241.1226 (1957) 376-396. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1957.0133
[8] R. Dakhlaoui, C. Braham, A. Baczmański, Mechanical properties of phases in austeno-ferritic duplex stainless steel – Surface stresses studied by X-ray diffraction, Mater. Sci. Eng.: A. 444 (2007) 6-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.06.074
[9] I. Alvarez-Armas, Duplex Stainless Steels, John Wiley & Sons, USA, 2009.
[10] E.P. Papadakis, T.P. Lerch, Pulse superposition, pulse-echo overlap and related techniques, Handbook of elastic properties of solids, liquids and gases. 1 (2001).
[11] J. Capek, M. Cernik, N. Ganev, K. Trojan, J. Nemecek, K. Kolarik, Comparison of rolling texture of austenite and ferrite phases of duplex steel with single-phase austenitic and ferritic steel, IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 375.1 (2018) 012025.
