Surface characteristics comparison between additively manufactured Ti6Al4V and wrought Ti6Al4V turned samples

Surface characteristics comparison between additively manufactured Ti6Al4V and wrought Ti6Al4V turned samples

SAFFIOTI Maria Rosaria, ROTELLA Giovanna, DEL PRETE Antonio

download PDF

Abstract. This paper aims to contribute increasing the knowledge surrounding Ti6Al4V by making a comprehensive comparative analysis of surface characteristics between additively manufactured and conventionally wrought Ti6Al4V turned samples. The tests were carried out by varying the process parameters such as cutting speed and lubricant conditions (dry and cryogenic), and by keeping fixed the feed rate and the depth of cut. The comparison of these two manufacturing methods allows to explore how the different surface properties, such as roughness, microstructure and hardness, can change.

Turning Process, Additive Manufacturing, Surface

Published online 4/24/2024, 7 pages
Copyright © 2024 by the author(s)
Published under license by Materials Research Forum LLC., Millersville PA, USA

Citation: SAFFIOTI Maria Rosaria, ROTELLA Giovanna, DEL PRETE Antonio, Surface characteristics comparison between additively manufactured Ti6Al4V and wrought Ti6Al4V turned samples, Materials Research Proceedings, Vol. 41, pp 2050-2056, 2024


The article was published as article 226 of the book Material Forming

Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.

[1] Jawahir, I.S., Brinksmeier, E., Saoubi, R.M., Aspinwall, D.K., Outeiro, J.C., Meyer, D., Umbrello, D., Jayal, A.D., Manufacturing Technology Surface integrity in material removal processes : Recent advances, CIRP Annals – Manuf. Technol. (2011) 60 603–626.
[2] Abdulhameed, O., Al-Ahmari, A., Ameen, W., & Mian, S.H. Additive manufacturing: Challenges, trends, and applications. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, (2019), 11(2), 1-27.
[3] Sharma S, Meena A. Microstructure attributes and tool wear mechanisms during high-speed machining of Ti-6Al-4V. J Manuf Process, (2020) ;50.
[4] Saffioti, M. R., Sanguedolce, M., Rotella, G., Umbrello, D., Experimental analysis on machining parameters and cooling conditions affecting surface integrity of Ti6Al4V. (2021), ESAFORM 2021 – 24th International Conference on Material Forming, Liège, Belgium.
[5] Revuru, R.S., Posinasetti, N.R., Vsn, V.R., Amrita, M., Application of cutting fluids in machining of titanium alloys—a review, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. (2017) 91 2477–2498.
[6] Umbrello D., Saffioti M. R., Imbrogno S., Surface modifications induced by turning on additively manufactured Zr-702 and their effects on cell adhesion and proliferation for biomedical applications, CIRP Annals, (2022), Volume 71, Issue 1, Pages 457-460, ISSN 0007-8506,
[7] Gupta, M.K., Song, Q., Liu, Z., Sarikaya, M., Jamil, M., Mia, M., Khanna, N., Krolczyk, G.M., Experimental characterization of the performance of hybrid cryo-lubrication assisted turning of Ti–6Al–4V alloy, Tribol. Int. (2021) 153 106582.
[8] Munoz ˜ JA, Higuera OF, Benito JA, Bradai D, Khelfa T, Bolmaro RE, et al. Analysis of the micro and substructural evolution during severe plastic deformation of ARMCO iron and consequences in mechanical properties. Mater Sci Eng A (2019):740–1.
[9] Saffioti M. R., Rotella G., Umbrello D., Superfinishing processes applied on the biomedical implants surface to improve their performance, Materials Research Proceedings, (2023) Vol. 28, pp 1341-1346.
[10] Axinte D, Guo Y, Liao Z, Shih AJ, M’Saoubi R, Sugita N, Machining of bio compatible materials — Recent advances. CIRP Annals Manufacturing Technology, (2019), 68/2:629–652.