Comparative Analysis of the Mobility Assessment Methods for Tracked Vehicles

Comparative Analysis of the Mobility Assessment Methods for Tracked Vehicles


download PDF

Abstract. The article presents the methods of determining the mobility of tracked vehicles, as well as a comparative analysis of the mobility of these vehicles on dirt roads and soil characterised by low bearing capacity. As part of the comparative analysis, a general description of the individual mobility assessment methods is presented, along with the indicator characteristics, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of the methods, when compared to others presented in the article. In the comparative analysis of the military vehicle mobility assessment, the means, by which mobility parameters were determined, the possibility of the practical application of a given approach, as well as its accuracy were considered.

Mobility, Trafficability, Tracked Vehicle, Mobility Index

Published online 7/20/2022, 6 pages
Copyright © 2022 by the author(s)
Published under license by Materials Research Forum LLC., Millersville PA, USA

Citation: PARTYKA Jacek, Comparative Analysis of the Mobility Assessment Methods for Tracked Vehicles, Materials Research Proceedings, Vol. 24, pp 221-226, 2022


The article was published as article 32 of the book Terotechnology XII

Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.

[1] A. Surowiecki, Z. Golemo, P. Saska. Wpływ zbrojenia tymczasowej nawierzchni drogowej na rozkład naprężeń w podłożu, WSOWL, Wrocław, 2004.
[2] J.Y. Wong, P. Jayakumarb, E. Tomac, J. Preston-Thomas. A review of mobility metrics for next generation vehicle mobility models, Journal of Terramechanics 87 (2020) 11-20.
[3] Y.J. Wong. Theory of ground vehicles 3rd Ed., McGrow-Wiley, Hoboken, 2001.
[4] M. Łopatka. Metody określania zdolności pokonywania terenu o niskiej nośności, Biuletyn WAT 10 (2004) 49-66.
[5] Y.Ch.D. Wong, H.H.S. Lim, W.Q.W. Chan. An Assessment of Land Vehicles’ Trafficability, DSTA Horizons (2016), pp. 54-63.
[6] FM 5-430-00-1 AFJPAM 32-8013, Vol I. Planning and design of roads, airfields, and heliports in the theater of operations – road design, Headquarters, Department of the Army Department of the Air Force, August 1994.
[7] D. Rowland. Tracked vehicle ground pressure and its effect on soft ground performance, Proc. 4th Int. Conf. of the International Society for Terrain-Vehicle Systems, Stockholm, 1972.
[8] D. Rowland, J.W. Peel. Soft ground performance prediction and assessment for wheeled and tracked vehicles, Institute of Mechanical Engineering 205 (1975) 81.
[9] E.B. Maclurin. The use of mobility numbers to describe the in-field tractive performance of pneumatic tyres, Proc. 10th Int. of the International Society for Terrain-Vehicle Systems Conf., Harper Adams University, 2003.
[10] M. Łopatka, W. Płocharz, A. Rubiec, K. Zembrowski. Badania nośności terenów podmokłych w aspekcie ich przejezdności, Logistyka i Nauka 3 (2015) 2929-2936.
[11] T. Ratajczak, Z. Kamyk. Metody wyznaczania przejezdności gruntu w warunkach polowych, Inżynieria wojskowa, problemy i perspektywy, V Konferencja Naukowo-Techniczna, 22-24.09.2008 (2008), Wrocław, 151 – 162.