Assessment of the Technological Position of a Selected Enterprise in the Metallurgical Industry

Assessment of the Technological Position of a Selected Enterprise in the Metallurgical Industry


download PDF

Abstract. A dynamic production market, in particular for the metallurgical industry, strongly influences the level of production efficiency, product quality, and mainly a company’s position on the market and its competitiveness. This paper presents the results of research on the assessment of the technological position of a selected average company from the metallurgical industry in relation to development strategies. The analysis of a company’s technological position has been made using the 3×3 matrix and Parker rating scale. The 3×3 matrix helped to determine an enterprise’s technological position as well as factors that affect it. As follows from the presented research, an enterprise is located as “ordinary, average” both in terms of its technological possibilities and its position on the market. However, it was also possible to indicate the factors to which the company should pay special attention in order to strengthen their importance.

Technological Portfolio, Technology Assessment, Metallurgical Industry, Matrix 3×3

Published online , 7 pages
Copyright © 2020 by the author(s)
Published under license by Materials Research Forum LLC., Millersville PA, USA

Citation: KLIMECKA-TATAR Dorota and INGALDI Manuela, Assessment of the Technological Position of a Selected Enterprise in the Metallurgical Industry, Materials Research Proceedings, Vol. 17, pp 72-78, 2020


The article was published as article 11 of the book Terotechnology XI

Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.

[1] M. Szary, K. Knop, Evaluation of technology and technological capabilities of the company from the metal industry, Archives of Engineering Knowledge 3 (2018) 31–34.
[2] H. Mao, S. Liu, J. Zhang, Z. Deng, Information technology resource, knowledge management capability, and competitive advantage: The moderating role of resource commitment, International Journal of Information Management 36 (2016) 1062–1074.
[3] S. Şener, E. Sarıdoğan, The Effects of Science-Technology-Innovation on Competitiveness and Economic Growth, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 24 (2011) 815–828.
[4] K.-F. Huang, Technology competencies in competitive environment, Journal of Business Research 64 (2011) 172–179.
[5] A. Bauer, K. Kastenhofer, Policy advice in technology assessment: Shifting roles, principles and boundaries, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 139 (2019) 32–41.
[6] A. Maszke, The analysis of machine operation and equipment loss in ironworks and steelworks, Production Engineering Archives 17 (2017) 45–48.
[7] K. Mielczarek, M. Krynke, Plastic production machinery – the evaluation of effectiveness, Production Engineering Archives 18 (2018) 42–45.
[8] G. Aranoff, Competitive manufacturing with fluctuating demand and diverse technology: Mathematical proofs and illuminations on industry output-flexibility, Economic Modelling 28 (2011) 1441–1450.
[9] S. Takakuwa, I. Veza, Technology Transfer and World Competitiveness, Procedia Engineering 69 (2014) 121–127.
[10] M. Tracey, M.A. Vonderembse, J.-S. Lim, Manufacturing technology and strategy formulation: keys to enhancing competitiveness and improving performance, Journal of Operations Management 17 (1999) 411–428.
[11] G. Dosi, M. Grazzi, D. Moschella, Technology and costs in international competitiveness: From countries and sectors to firms, Research Policy 44 (2015) 1795–1814.
[12] Z. Liao, M.T. Cheung, Do competitive strategies drive R&D? An empirical investigation of Japanese high-technology corporations, J. High Tech. Manag. Res. 13 (2002) 143–156.
[13] D. Jolly, The issue of weightings in technology portfolio management, Technovation 23 (2003) 383–391.
[14] J. Frishammar, U. Lichtenthaler, M. Kurkkio, The front end in non-assembled product development: A multiple case study of mineral- and metal firms, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 29 (2012) 468–488.
[15] Depenbrock, T. Balint, J. Sheehy, Leveraging design principles to optimize technology portfolio prioritization, IEEE Aerospace Conference (2015) 1–10.
[16] P.H. Nguyen, K.-J. Wang, Strategic capacity portfolio planning under demand uncertainty and technological change, Flex Serv Manuf J 31 (2019) 926–944.
[17] H. Ajjan, R.L. Kumar, C. Subramaniam, Information technology portfolio management implementation: a case study, Journal of Enterprise Info Management 29 (2016) 841–859.
[18] M. Ingaldi, Use of the SWOT ANALYSIS and 3×3 matrix to determine the technological posistion of the chosen metal company, Acta Metall. Slovaca – Conf. 4 (2014) 207–214.
[19] S. Borkowski, R. Ulewicz, J. Selejdak, M. Konstanciak, D. Klimecka-Tatar, The Use of 3×3 Matrix to Evaluation of Ribbed Wire Manufacturing Technology, METAL 2012: 21st Int. Conf. on Metallurgy and Materials, Ostrava, TANGER, 2012, 1722–1728.
[20] P. Lowe, Management of Technology: Perception and Opportunities, Chapman & Hall, London, 1995.
[21] R. Dwornicka, N. Radek, M. Krawczyk, P. Osocha, J. Pobedza, The laser textured surfaces of the silicon carbide analyzed with the bootstrapped tribology model. METAL 2017 26th Int. Conf. on Metallurgy and Materials, Ostrava, Tanger, 2017, 1252-1257.
[22] N. Radek, M. Scendo, I. Pliszka, O. Paraska, Properties of Electro-Spark Deposited Coatings Modified Via Laser Beam. Powder Metall. Met. Ceram. 57 (2018) 316-324.
[23] S. Wojciechowski, P. Twardowski, T. Chwalczuk, Surface Roughness Analysis after Machining of Direct Laser Deposited Tungsten Carbide, Journal of Physics Conference Series 483 (2014) art. 012018.
[24] I. Pliszka, N. Radek, A. Gadek-Moszczak, P. Fabian, O. Paraska, Surface improvement by WC-Cu electro-spark coatings with laser modification. Materials Research Proceedings 5 (2018) 237-242.
[25] L. Wojnar, A. Gadek-Moszczak, J. Pietraszek, On the role of histomorphometric (stereological) microstructure parameters in the prediction of vertebrae compression strength. Image Analysis and Stereology 38 (2019) 63-73.
[26] P. Krawiec, A. Marlewski, Spline description of non-typical gears for belt transmissions. J. Theor. Appl. Mech. 49 (2011) 355-367.
[27] G. Filo, E. Lisowski, M. Domagala, J. Fabis-Domagala, H. Momeni, Modelling of pressure pulse generator with the use of a flow control valve and a fuzzy logic controller. AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 2029, art. 020015-1.
[28] A. Pacana, K. Czerwinska, R. Dwornicka, Analysis of non-compliance for the cast of the industrial robot basis, METAL 2019 28th Int. Conf. on Metallurgy and Materials (2019), Ostrava, Tanger 644-650.
[29] J. Pietraszek, E. Skrzypczak-Pietraszek, The optimization of the technological process with the fuzzy regression. Adv. Mater. Res-Switz. 874 (2014) 151-155.
[30] L. Skrzypczak, E. Skrzypczak-Pietraszek, E. Lamer-Zarawska, B. Hojden, Micropropagation of Oenothera-Biennis L. and an assay of fatty-acids. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 63 (1994) 173-177.
[31] L.J. Orman, R. Chatys, Heat transfer augmentation possibility for vehicle heat exchangers. 15th Int. Conf. on Transport Means, Kaunas (2011) 9-12.
[32] T. Styrylska, J. Pietraszek, Numerical modeling of non-steady-state temperature-fields with supplementary data. ZAMM 72 (1992) T537-T539.
[33] J. Pietraszek, M. Kolomycki, A. Szczotok, R. Dwornicka, The Fuzzy Approach to Assessment of ANOVA Results. ICCCI 2016 8th Conf. Comp. Coll. Intell. LNAI 9875 (2016) 260-268.