Green Sandwich Composites Fabricated from Flax FRP Facings and Corrugated Cardboard Cores
A. McCracken, P. Sadeghian
Abstract. Composite sandwich beams and panels made of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) and lightweight, low-density core materials have been shown to be effective in reducing weight and increasing strength and stiffness in a variety of structural applications. The FRP skins resist the tensile and compressive stresses as a result of flexure, similar to the action of the flanges on an I-Beam, while the core resists shear stresses, provides insulation and increases the distance between skins resulting in a higher moment of inertia. In this study, sandwich panels made of green materials are studied. Namely, flax fibers and partial bio-based epoxy were used for the FRP skin and three flute varieties of corrugated cardboard with bulk densities of 127, 138 and 170 kg/m3 were used for the core. A total of 30 small-scale sandwich beam specimens were manufactured across six unique beam varieties with dimensions of 50 mm in width, 25 mm in depth, and 200 and 350 mm in length (150 mm and 300 mm spans) to be tested under four-point bending up to failure. This is an ongoing research and so far 6 of the sandwich beams have been tested and the results are presented in this paper. The load-deflection behavior, load-strain behavior and moment-curvature behavior as well as the strength and stiffness of the sandwich beam specimens were analyzed. Overall, the flax FRP and cardboard sandwiches displayed promising structural behavior and may be considered as a viable, green option for the fabrication of sandwich composite panels. More results will be presented during the conference.
Keywords
Green, Flax Fiber Composite, Bio-Based Polymer, Cardboard, Sandwich
Published online , 10 pages
Copyright © 2018 by the author(s)
Published under license by Materials Research Forum LLC., Millersville PA, USA
Citation: A. McCracken, P. Sadeghian, ‘Green Sandwich Composites Fabricated from Flax FRP Facings and Corrugated Cardboard Cores’, Materials Research Proceedings, Vol. 7, pp 285-294, 2018
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21741/9781945291838-26
The article was published as article 26 of the book Non-Conventional Materials and Technologies
References
[1] Reis EM, Rizkalla SH. Material characteristics of 3-D FRP sandwich panels. Construction and Building Materials. 2008 Jun 30;22(6):1009-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.03.023
[2] Allen HG. Analysis and design of structural sandwich panels: the commonwealth and international library: structures and solid body mechanics division. Elsevier; 2013 Oct 22.
[3] Manalo A, Aravinthan T, Fam A, Benmokrane B. State-of-the-art review on FRP sandwich systems for lightweight civil infrastructure. Journal of Composites for Construction. 2016 Jul 5;21(1):04016068. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000729
[4] Mallaiah S, Sharma KV, Krishna M. Development and comparative studies of bio-based and synthetic fiber based sandwich structures. Int J Soft Compos Eng. 2012;2:332-5.
[5] Betts D, Sadeghian P, Fam A. Structural Behaviour of Sandwich Panels Constructed of Foam Cores and Flax FRP Facings. Canadian Society for Civil Engineering (CSCE) Annual Conference, May 31 – Jun. 3, 2017, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
[6] Sadeghian P, Hristozov D, Wroblewski L. Experimental and analytical behavior of sandwich composite beams: Comparison of natural and synthetic materials. Journal of Sandwich Structures & Materials. 2016 May 31:1099636216649891.
[7] Wambua P, Ivens J, Verpoest I. Natural fibres: can they replace glass in fibre reinforced plastics?. composites science and technology. 2003 Jul 31;63(9):1259-64.
[8] Gupta N, Woldesenbet E. Characterization of flexural properties of syntactic foam core sandwich composites and effect of density variation. Journal of composite materials. 2005 Dec;39(24):2197-212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998305052037
[9] Wadley HN, Fleck NA, Evans AG. Fabrication and structural performance of periodic cellular metal sandwich structures. Composites Science and Technology. 2003 Dec 31;63(16):2331-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00266-5
[10] Paper and Paperboard Packaging Environmental Council. Factsheet 03-2017. http://www.ppec-paper.com/pdfFiles/factsheets/2017/Packaging/FS03-2017.pdf
[11] Dweib MA, Hu B, O’donnell A, Shenton HW, Wool RP. All natural composite sandwich beams for structural applications. Composite structures. 2004 Feb 29;63(2):147-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8223(03)00143-0
[12] Betts D, Sadeghian P, Fam A. Tensile Properties of Flax FRP Composites. In 6th Asia-Pacific Conference on FRP in Structures (APFIS 2017) 2017 Jul 19. 6th Asia-Pacific Conference on FRP in Structures, Singapore.
[13] ASTM D7249. Standard test method for facing properties of sandwich constructions by long beam flexure. West Conshohocken, PA, USA: ASTM International, 2012.
[14] ASTM D7250. Standard practice for determining sandwich beam flexural and shear stiffness. West Conshohocken, PA, USA: ASTM International, 2012.
