Numerical study of influence of protective materials on photovoltaic cell efficiency: comparison between glass and teflon

$15.00

A. LAAZIZI, H. LABRIM, H. EZ-ZAHRAOUY, K. NOUNEH

Abstract. Predicting the temperature field in protective materials can contribute to enhance performance of photovoltaic panels. Materials as Glass or Teflon, on which protective layers have been made and are often employed to protect photovoltaic cells, have an effect on heat transfer through photovoltaic cells. Teflon is known as an excellent dielectric. In this context, heat transfer was simulated by using Finite Difference Method with explicit scheme. The temperature field was computed for the two different materials. First results showed that for both studied materials, the temperature field as well as the rate of heat transfer during daytime and of cooling during night are very different. With this knowledge, engineers can design new system to improve the efficiency of solar panels that operate in non-optimal conditions.

Keywords
Numerical Simulation, Photovoltaic, Efficiency, Explicit Scheme, Heat Transfer

Published online 12/10/2016, 4 pages
Copyright © 2016 by the author(s)
Published under license by Materials Research Forum LLC., Millersville PA, USA
Citation: A. LAAZIZI, H. LABRIM, H. EZ-ZAHRAOUY, K. NOUNEH, ‘Numerical study of influence of protective materials on photovoltaic cell efficiency: comparison between glass and teflon’, Materials Research Proceedings, Vol. 1, pp 179-182, 2016
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21741/9781945291197-45

The article was published as article 45 of the book Dielectric Materials and Applications

References
[1] J.S. Griffith, N.S. Rathod, and J. Paslaski, “Some tests of flat plate photovoltaic module cell temperatures in simulated field conditions”, Proc. 15th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conf., Kissimmee, FL, 1981, pp.822-830.
[2] J.S. Cashmore et al., “Improved Conversion Efficiencies of Thin-Film Silicon Tandem (MICROMORPH) Photovoltaic Modules,” J. Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells 144, pp. 84–95, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2015.08.022
[3] A. Cortes et al., “Numerical evaluation of the effect of photovoltaic cell installation on urban thermal environment,” J. Sustainable Cities and Society 19, pp. 250–258, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2015.07.012
[4] A. Bai et al, “Technical and Economic Effects of Cooling of Monocrystalline Photovoltaic Modules under Hungarian Conditions,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 60, pp. 1086–1099, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.02.003
[5] E. Urrejolaa et al., “Effect of Soiling and Sunlight Exposure on the Performance Ratio of Photovoltaic Technologies in Santiago, Chile,” Vol. 114, pp. 338–347, 15 April 2016.
[6] A. Hasana et al., “Increased Photovoltaic Performance Through Temperature Regulation by Phase Change Materials: Materials Comparison in Different Climates,” J. Solar Energy, Vol. 115, pp. 264–276, May 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2015.02.003
[7] A. Laazizi, B. Courant, F. Jacquemin and H. Andrzejewski, “Applied Multi-Pulsed Laser in Surface Treatment and Numerical–Experimental Analysis,” J. Optics & Laser Technology 43, pp. 1257–1263, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2011.03.019